Header
about | contact | sitemap | home
Mesothelioma

What is Mesothelioma

Pleural Mesothelioma

Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Pericardial Mesothelioma

Risk Factors

Symptoms

Stages

Asbestosis

Mesothelioma Treatment

Treatment Options

Treatment by stages

Chemotherapy

Medical Procedures

Imaging Scans

Types of Doctors

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials Directory

Cancer Care Centers

Mesothelioma Specialists

Alternative Therapies

Asbestos

Types of Asbestos

Asbestos Industry

Asbestos History

In the Workplace

Asbestos Legislation

Asbestos Removal

Legal Help

Your Legal Rights

Choosing an Attorney

The Legal Process

Evaluating Your Case

Brooklyn Jury Gives Millions to Railroad Workers

July 31, 2006 - Following an eight-day trial, a jury in Brooklyn, NY awarded a total of $16.4 million to three plaintiffs that had been long-time employees of the Long Island Railroad (LIRR). 

The three men - Albito Velez-Zapata (age 61) of Massepequa Park, New York, Lincoln Aguirre (age 61) of Deer Park, New York, and James Harrington (age 54) of Brookville, New York – were all machinists with the railroad.  It was there job to grind gaskets on a high resolution wire wheel.  The gaskets contained deadly asbestos.  The lawsuit also stated that the three men worked around contaminated rail cars and locomotives on a regular basis.

The men filed their claims in accordance with the Federal Employee's Liability Act (FELA), a special law designed to protect interstate railroad workers. 

The jury noted that they found in favor of the men because they were convinced that the railroad knew about the dangers of asbestos dust as far back as the 1930s yet failed to warn workers of the hazards.  In return, lawyers for the LIRR stated that the men were offered dust masks, even though the company’s current literature in regards to asbestos states that dusk masks are not sufficient protection.  Furthermore, it was determined that the company didn’t start an Asbestos Awareness program until the mid 1990s, long after others in the railroad and other at-risk industries initiated such programs. 

"The LIRR treated these workers as if they were expendable or disposable, just like the machines that it was their job to repair,” said an attorney for the three workers, all of whom are currently suffering from asbestos-related lung diseases. 

Velez-Zapata was awarded $8 million.  Aguirre received $6 million and Harrington got $2.4 million.  The railroad will appeal.

 

Free Mesothelioma Information Pack

Mesothelioma Packet Enter your information to receive a free mesothelioma information packet in 24 hours.

First Name:

Last Name:

Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Telephone:

Email Address:

Is it possible you
or someone you
know has
mesothelioma?
Yes   No

frequently asked questions
glossary
job sites

Shipyards

Metal Works

Powerhouses

Other Job Sites

mesothelioma

Current News

Archived News

Cleanup of Colorado Icehouse More Than Expected Due to Additional Asbestos Pueblo County, Colorado District 2 Commissioner candidate Republican Debbie Rose claimed that asbestos cleanup ...

Washington Woman Files Suit After Developing Mesothelioma Cancer

A Washington woman has recently filed a lawsuit in Madison County Circuit Court claiming that her mesotheli ...

Missouri Man Files Asbestos Suit

Missouri resident Homer Earl Farrar filed a lawsuit against 105 defendant corporations, claiming that his ...

Secretary at Iron Company Develops Mesothelioma

Group Offers Asbestos Removal Kit

Labor Union Searching for Former Shipyard Workers

Support

Coping Process

Managing Pain

Nutrition

For the Caregiver

Feelings After Diagnosis

Dealing with Symptoms

Practical Issues

Relationship Issues

Wills and DNRs

Resources

Thank you for visiting this website which is sponsored by the Law Firm of EARLY, LUDWICK, SWEENEY & STRAUSS, LLC. This website is devoted to the needs of people diagnosed with mesothelioma. The content contained herein was not prepared by medical professionals nor should it be taken as a substitute for medical advice. Additionally, this information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship simply by its viewing. The creation of an attorney-client relationship requires more than viewing this or affiliated websites. Neither the transmission nor receipt of this website material will create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. The material contained herein is general in nature and may not apply to your particular factual or legal circumstances. Online readers should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please read our disclaimer for more information.